Germany’s Migrants Continuing To Enrich The Nation

The mass arrival in 2015 of millions of refugees-turned-migrants into Germany was cheered by the left, and implicitly offered as a masochistic sacrifice to the god of multiculturalism as an atonement for Germany’s Nazi past.

Angela Merkel, the high priestess of this New Age Germanic religion, stated this past Sunday on German TV that she won’t accept an upper limit on refugees coming into the country, a decision which will either result in her removal as Chancellor in the September elections, or the further enrichment of the country she has lead since 2005 – in November this year a total of 12 years.

It’s ironic that after 12 years of National Socialism Germany was left in ruins and overrun by armies from the East, raping and murdering their way to Berlin. Admittedly the situation is not as disastrous now, but it’s an interesting comparison to behold.

Police spokesman in the southern German town of Schorndorf described the recent violence at a summer fair there as “shocking,” as reported by RT:

A German town’s summer fair turned violent over the weekend, with multiple sexual assaults reported. A group of youths also attacked visitors and officers, with police stating that many of the offenders were migrants.

The violence occurred while residents of Schorndorf in the southern German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg celebrated the town’s weeklong fair, referred to as Volksfest (People’s Festival).

However, while many were enjoying carnival rides and German beer on Friday – the first day of the fair – at least three sexual assaults occurred in the town, resulting in the detention of an Iraqi suspect.

No doubt the Iraqi suspect was furious about all the beer and pork sausages on sale and decided to vent his anger at being allowed into the country by sexually assaulting whoever or whatever – the article doesn’t specify – crossed his troubled path.

A 17-year-old girl was the victim of a separate sexual assault on Saturday, after three men held her and “grabbed her buttocks”outside the town’s main rail station. Three Afghan asylum seekers were identified as suspects, according to police.

Here the article clearly states the victim was a girl. Will these Afghan “asylum seekers” be immediately deported along with their Iraqi co-religionist for this ongoing violence against women? Why aren’t feminists out on the streets vociferously condemning this? Are they more concerned about the German patriarchy than the prospect of Sharia Law?

Meanwhile, around 1,000 youths and young men gathered at the grounds of Schorndorf Castle on Saturday, throwing bottles at festival-goers and police.

When police began arresting one person on suspicion of causing serious bodily harm, others within the group “showed solidarity” with the man and intensified their assault against officers, according to law enforcement officials.

Police then called for backup, prompting more officers to arrive at the scene in riot gear, “to shield the arrest and to prevent an attack.”

Authorities also called in support from nearby towns, to prepare for what they referred to as “massive potential for violence.”

Groups of between 30 and 50 young men were later seen acting aggressively throughout the town on Saturday, with eyewitnesses, cited by police, stating that some were armed with knives. One man reportedly had a blank-firing gun.

The only thing these savages understand is violence – anything else is interpreted as weakness. Armed police who are confronted by mobs of men carrying knives and wreaking havoc in an otherwise peaceful town would be justified in using lethal force to bring this dangerous threat under control.

There’s no doubt that had this occurred in Israel or the United States there would have been coroners involved after shots were fired by the police and the remainder of the mob of rioters had dispersed quicker than you can say Bratwurst.

Unfortunately Germany, it’s police, and men have been castrated by their high priestess Merkel, who leads her army of eunuchs into the abyss from which there will be no repeat of the Wirtschaftswunder.


African Overpopulation And Global Elites

The co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned in an interview with the German Welt am Sonntag newspaper that “Africa’s population explosion will overwhelm Europe unless the continent makes it more difficult for migrants to reach its shores.”

Of course Europeans – especially Italians who are currently inundated by the interminable arrival of migrant boats packed with Africans due to their proximity to lawless Libya and the tireless efforts of treasonous NGO’s – need no reminding of the problems faced by African overpopulation and the demographic pressures it creates, but the fact that a committed globalist like Bill Gates come out and said it is interesting.

The article continues with the following:

But Gates also spoke of a dilemma caused by ‘the German attitude to refugees’, referring to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to open Europe’s borders to illegal migrants arriving from the third world.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this  — which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa,” Gates told the Sunday newspaper.

“Germany cannot possibly take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”

Because of this, Gates stressed that “Europe must make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes”.

All of this makes perfect sense, and one wonders why he and others in positions of real power haven’t come out and said it before – it’s not as if African migrant ships landing on Europe’s southern shores is a new phenomenon, albeit never as intense as this. In short, this could have been easily predicted and subsequently avoided.

In truth it was certainly predicted, but not only was there no will to deal with it in a timely manner, but the decision was undoubtably made to allow it to happen as a means of destroying European nationalism – in this sense nationalism used as a broad term to describe ethnic and political identification with a nation, and the cultural traditions of that ethnic people – and allowing the creation of a global government partly to deal with the crisis.

So following this unusual warning from Bill Gates, Reuters is reporting that his fellow billionaire and close friend Warren Buffett is donating $2.42 B to the Gates Foundation – now if that isn’t an endorsement of Gates’ latest comments then Buffett should be more careful with his billions.

If that wasn’t coincidental enough then French President Emmanuel Macron, AKA Jupiter, said that Africa was being “held back by ‘civilisational’ problems and women having ‘seven or eight children,'” while speaking at the G20 summit.

That’s two committed globalists – Macron is a fervent believer in the EU (not to be confused with Europe) which is a globalist project – coming out within a week of each other talking about African overpopulation. Does this mean they had a joint epiphany and suddenly decided to forsake their globalist ideology and join the alt-right? Certainly not. So what’s going on then?

Europe, and by extension the West, is a golden calf that the elites have used for their own enrichment and fulfilment of their long term plans for global government. But if Europe becomes a failed extension of Africa then their plan will fail. Consequently the objective has always been to find the right balance between the destruction of European nationalism via multiculturalism and ethnic dissolution, and the use of the old continent as a motor for globalist government.

China cannot be trusted to follow the globalist plan through as it’s clear they have their own agenda which does not lead to their own cultural destruction through mass immigration – the majority Han Chinese have always been and still are, even under a communist government, an ethnocentric people, and the thought of submitting to “barbarian” hegemony again is anathema to them.

Based on the statements by Gates and Macron we should expect more action to be taken to limit the flow of migrant ships to Europe. The damage is done in terms of European nationalism – the future is multicultural, at least in Western Europe, whether we like it or not. The number of non-ethnic Europeans is simply too large to even contemplate repatriation, even if nationalist parties like the Front Nacional in France were to miraculously win power in their respective national elections.

As much as it pains to admit it, Western Europe is lost as we know it, but European civilisation will continue to survive in pockets of resistance, and most likely a new beginning for many will have to be made in Central and Eastern Europe, where the madness of unrestrained immigration and wilful self-destruction has not infected the collective minds of those nations yet – strange to think that the future of the old continent  is in the former haunt of communism.








Refugees Who Become Welfare Migrants

When the “refugee crisis” began in 2015 – or rather was provoked by those intent on destroying European nationalism and culture through “multiculturalism” – the propaganda churned out by the legacy media attempted to fool concerned Europeans into believing that the hordes of military aged men invading the old continent via the eastern Mediterranean and Balkans were fleeing war, mainly from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

However it was clear to anyone with a little common sense that these “refugees” were not fleeing war, but rather migrating to rich European countries because of their generous welfare systems, and in the case of Germany, the encouragement of a Chancellor who under normal circumstances would be accused of treason rather than praised as a humanitarian.

Now Europeans are being conditioned to accept that these refugees supposedly fleeing war, are now migrants here to stay, despite the crime and mayhem they’ve brought with them. According to AFP via Yahoo News:

The peak of the migrant crisis in Europe has passed but many of those who came are here to stay and governments must focus on helping them integrate, the OECD said Thursday.

But many of those who came, fleeing war or persecution, “are likely to stay for some time, at least until their home countries are safe again”, said Stefano Scarpetta, OECD Director for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, in the report.

The peak may have passed but the damage is done, and it will not end until European politicians are forced by European citizens to put an end to this madness of cultural dissolution. In the case of Italy it seems that the boats filled with thousands of African migrants landing on its shores – in many cases with the aid of NGO’s – has finally forced its government to threaten the EU with closing its ports.

It goes without question that these refugees turned migrants are likely to stay considering the financial aid they receive in countries like Germany and Sweden, and regardless of whether their home countries become safe again, it’s unlikely they’ll be compelled to return to the deserts or war torn cities that they came from. Needless to say that Stefano Scarpetta is perfectly happy about this, probably because he thinks that cheap labour is good for business, and is no doubt rich enough to preach from his ivory tower.

OECD countries registered more than 1.6 million asylum requests, with at least two-thirds in European states, and 1.5 million were granted.

Presenting the report, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said international efforts were needed to address “negative perceptions” about migration, “which are often rooted in a misconception of the benefit that migrants can bring to recipient countries.”

The report said some countries had stepped up their integration efforts, praising the examples of the fast-track integration programme introduced in Sweden and the adoption of the first-ever law on integration in Germany.

But it said integration policies were falling short in other countries.

Perhaps if Angel Gurria could list some of the benefits that he’s referring to it would help address the negative perceptions that undoubtably exist, thanks in no small part to the terrorist attacks perpetrated by muslims, and the increase in violent crimes – including rape and murder – which have led to a backlash in Germany, and a government free-speech clampdown on people posting on Facebook and other social media sites.

It’s interesting to note that Gurria is a Mexican, preaching to European countries about “falling short” on integration policies. He’s also a man that was given the “Globalist of the Year” award from the Canadian International Council for his contribution to innovation in global governance and international affairs.

Undoubtably globalists like Gurria, intent on destroying nationalism as a prerequisite to world government, are frustrated by the opposition that central European countries like Poland are showing to their destructive agenda, as reported by Reuters:

Poland has a moral right to say ‘no’ to refugees, the country’s most powerful politician said on Saturday.

Jaroslaw Kaczynski, head of the ruling party Law and Justice (PiS), gave his views on immigration at a party convention in Przysucha, 100 km (60 miles) south of Warsaw.

“We have not exploited the countries from which these refugees are coming to Europe these days, we have not used their labor force and finally we have not invited them to Europe. We have a full moral right to say ‘no’,” Kaczynski said in a speech broadcast on television.

If western Europe is to survive our governments need to say “no” also, and if they’re not able to represent the will of the people they need to be replaced with leaders that are willing and able. Europe needs it equivalent of a wall with Mexico, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and a leader who is ready to Make Europe Great Again.