African Overpopulation And Global Elites

The co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned in an interview with the German Welt am Sonntag newspaper that “Africa’s population explosion will overwhelm Europe unless the continent makes it more difficult for migrants to reach its shores.”

Of course Europeans – especially Italians who are currently inundated by the interminable arrival of migrant boats packed with Africans due to their proximity to lawless Libya and the tireless efforts of treasonous NGO’s – need no reminding of the problems faced by African overpopulation and the demographic pressures it creates, but the fact that a committed globalist like Bill Gates come out and said it is interesting.

The article continues with the following:

But Gates also spoke of a dilemma caused by ‘the German attitude to refugees’, referring to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to open Europe’s borders to illegal migrants arriving from the third world.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this  — which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa,” Gates told the Sunday newspaper.

“Germany cannot possibly take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”

Because of this, Gates stressed that “Europe must make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes”.

All of this makes perfect sense, and one wonders why he and others in positions of real power haven’t come out and said it before – it’s not as if African migrant ships landing on Europe’s southern shores is a new phenomenon, albeit never as intense as this. In short, this could have been easily predicted and subsequently avoided.

In truth it was certainly predicted, but not only was there no will to deal with it in a timely manner, but the decision was undoubtably made to allow it to happen as a means of destroying European nationalism – in this sense nationalism used as a broad term to describe ethnic and political identification with a nation, and the cultural traditions of that ethnic people – and allowing the creation of a global government partly to deal with the crisis.

So following this unusual warning from Bill Gates, Reuters is reporting that his fellow billionaire and close friend Warren Buffett is donating $2.42 B to the Gates Foundation – now if that isn’t an endorsement of Gates’ latest comments then Buffett should be more careful with his billions.

If that wasn’t coincidental enough then French President Emmanuel Macron, AKA Jupiter, said that Africa was being “held back by ‘civilisational’ problems and women having ‘seven or eight children,'” while speaking at the G20 summit.

That’s two committed globalists – Macron is a fervent believer in the EU (not to be confused with Europe) which is a globalist project – coming out within a week of each other talking about African overpopulation. Does this mean they had a joint epiphany and suddenly decided to forsake their globalist ideology and join the alt-right? Certainly not. So what’s going on then?

Europe, and by extension the West, is a golden calf that the elites have used for their own enrichment and fulfilment of their long term plans for global government. But if Europe becomes a failed extension of Africa then their plan will fail. Consequently the objective has always been to find the right balance between the destruction of European nationalism via multiculturalism and ethnic dissolution, and the use of the old continent as a motor for globalist government.

China cannot be trusted to follow the globalist plan through as it’s clear they have their own agenda which does not lead to their own cultural destruction through mass immigration – the majority Han Chinese have always been and still are, even under a communist government, an ethnocentric people, and the thought of submitting to “barbarian” hegemony again is anathema to them.

Based on the statements by Gates and Macron we should expect more action to be taken to limit the flow of migrant ships to Europe. The damage is done in terms of European nationalism – the future is multicultural, at least in Western Europe, whether we like it or not. The number of non-ethnic Europeans is simply too large to even contemplate repatriation, even if nationalist parties like the Front Nacional in France were to miraculously win power in their respective national elections.

As much as it pains to admit it, Western Europe is lost as we know it, but European civilisation will continue to survive in pockets of resistance, and most likely a new beginning for many will have to be made in Central and Eastern Europe, where the madness of unrestrained immigration and wilful self-destruction has not infected the collective minds of those nations yet – strange to think that the future of the old continent  is in the former haunt of communism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Emergency: White Kids Bullying Minorities En Masse in America!

Occasionally I pluck up the courage to visit some of the most “progressive” news sites on the internet to find out what’s currently going on in the delusional echo chamber of the left, much as I hate my visit contributing to their ad revenue.

Hence I ended up on AlterNet’s website, and was immediately struck by the following headline: “White Kids Are Bullying Minority Students Using Trump’s Words.”

Intrigued as to what was meant by “Trump’s Words” – thinking perhaps that between tweets President Trump had penned a special bullying lexicon for an army of white kids wearing MAGA hats – I proceeded to read the accompanying article:

Donald Trump’s real campaign promise was that he would give whites back the power they imagined they’d lost. That message was stated not in dog whistles, but loudly enough that the entire country heard him, even children. The trickle-down effect of Trump’s campaign rhetoric and election is now being felt among kids in schools across the country. Bullying, according to a Buzzfeed News report, has taken on an “alarming twist…with white students using the president’s words and slogans to bully Latino, Middle Eastern, black, Asian, and Jewish classmates.”

Presumably Kali Holloway – the “senior writer” responsible for this article – knows something we don’t, namely the “real campaign promise” of white supremacy, which must have been advocated through a dog whistle, because no-one but her heard the ultrasonic hate speech.

There’s a link to the original article in Buzzfeed which I was unwilling to read due to it’s ludicrous length, and my anticipation of the type of “progressive” propaganda I would subject myself to throughout the screed if I relented and proceeded.

Luckily Kali did the hard-work for us:

Buzzfeed reporters analyzed data collected by the Documenting Hate Project, which catalogs reports of bias and bullying, and found more than “50 incidents, across 26 states, in which a K-12 student invoked Trump’s name or message in an apparent effort to harass a classmate during the past school year.” The incidents took place between October 2016 and May 2017. Here are just a fraction of the incidents cited by Buzzfeed investigators:

  • A group of white male students at a high school in Shakopee, Minnesota who surrounded an African-American girl and sang the national anthem, “replacing the closing line with ‘and the home of the slaves.’”

  • In a third-grade classroom in Louisville, Kentucky, a boy chased a Latina girl while screaming “Build the wall!”

  • On the school bus, a white eighth-grader told a Filipino classmate, “You are going to be deported.”

  • A white eighth-grade student in Brea, California, told a black student, “Now that Trump won, you’re going to have to go back to Africa, where you belong.”

  • An English teacher in Spokane Valley, Washington, describes discovering a “group of white students following a Latino student in the hallway, taunting him with chants of ‘the wall’s coming!’ and ‘Trump! Trump! Trump!’”

  • The Dallas, Texas mother of a sixth-grader reported that on Election Day, students at her son’s school harassed him and his friends with shouts of, “Heil Hitlary.” One of the bullied students was told, “One million of your lives is worth less than 30,000 deleted emails.”

Bullying in schools is something that shouldn’t be taken lightly, especially when it leads to physical violence, and by listing these as the worst cases they do a disservice to the victims of bullying which resulted in injury or death.

It says a lot about the mentality of writers such as these within their echo chamber who depict white children as the perpetrators and minorities as the victims of bullying, without even bothering to provide the statistics of white victims to add some impartiality. Do they think this is the beginning of genocide on an industrial scale in America by jackbooted Trump supporters?

Hate crimes involving adult perpetrators who used Trump’s name or quoted his rhetoric during acts of violence and harassment began making the news during the presidential campaign. The Southern Poverty Law Center documented more than 1,300 hate crimes nationally “between the 2016 election and February 2017.”

White Trump supporters getting attacked indiscriminately also began making the news, but apparently they didn’t notice, or chose to ignore it because it’s not convenient to their narrative. Were any of these numerous attacks against whites included in that figure of 1,300 “hate crimes” diligently documented by the SPLC? I’m guessing the answer is no – must be something to do with white privilege.

In a survey of K-12 educators in the months before Trump’s election win, the SPLC found a precipitous rise in incidents of racist bullying. In the weeks after November 8, a poll of 10,000 K-12 teachers, counselors and administrators found an uptick in the “use of slurs and derogatory language, and disturbing incidents involving swastikas, Nazi salutes and Confederate flags.” Roughly 90 percent of respondents said the “school climate has been negatively affected, and most of them believe it will have a long-lasting impact.” Similarly, “80 percent describe heightened anxiety and concern on the part of students worried about the impact of the election on themselves and their families.”

Presumably the SPLC didn’t conduct any extensive investigations into the “precipitous rise of incidents.” For example it would be interesting to know how many of the “disturbing incidents involving swastikas” were committed by whites, and how many were committed by non-whites. That’s one example of many that are documented in the Fake Hate Crimes website.

Numerous studies have shown that bullying has effects that last long past childhood, affecting adulthood mental health, ability to form relationships and self-esteem. These consequences add to the trauma many students from racial and religious minorities already experience when dealing with subtle daily discrimination. A 2015 study by researchers from Vanderbilt University found the “cumulative effects of living in a society characterized by white dominance and privilege produces a kind of physical and mental wear-and-tear that contributes to a host of psychological and physical ailments…[including] anxiety, stress, depression and thoughts of suicide, as well as a host of physical ailments like hair loss, diabetes and heart disease.”

No word of course on the fact that the majority of people committing suicide in the US are white males, or that some Democrats have even joked about it on video – apparently gleeful about the prospect of an America where whites are a minority – because again, it doesn’t fit into their narrative which breeds hate rather than address it honestly. The only question remaining is whether this is a deliberate agenda to deceive or blind ignorance?