CNN Needs To Be Made An Example Of

The legacy media in the US, Europe, and every other part of the world where their lies and manipulations have deceived credulous baby boomer audiences long enough, need to be sent a clear message that their monopoly of information has come to an end, as will eventually the media conglomerates that finance them.

During the campaign and now into his Presidency, Donald Trump made it clear that CNN is his biggest enemy in terms of fake legacy media. So be it, CNN needs to be made an example of, especially after its latest outrageous blackmail blunder against a Reddit user who allegedly created the Trump-CNN wrestling meme that the President retweeted much to the delight of everyone with a sense of humour.

Stefan Molyneux articulately summarises the rest of the story in the following video:

CNN needs to be figuratively destroyed. The memes need to continue and become overwhelming, flooding social media everywhere, and the President needs to retweet until the tips of his thumbs become calloused.

The alternative, independent media, and citizen journalists everywhere need to collaborate against this seditious cable network and expose its lies, manipulations, and now blackmail. Its employees need to be exposed by an army of Project Veritas copycats as the enemy-of-truth collaborators that they are.

But we should not be under any illusions that this is a fight that will be easily won. Time Warner, the parent company of Turner Broadcasting System, which owns CNN, has deep pockets, and can throw money at this failing cable news network, even as its audiences dwindle and die.

In reality the globalists need CNN to survive for as long as possible, because it still has the power to sway certain large segments of public opinion – either directly or by osmosis – surprising as that may sound to younger readers who are nauseated by the mere thought of watching Alisyn Camerota or Chris Cuomo vomit their propaganda through the airwaves.

Only when CNN is no longer viable, in large part through the collaborative effort of the above mentioned, will they allow it to die and transform into something new – AT&T announced last year that they mean to acquire Time Warner – which will attempt to dupe a new generation of internet users into believing their fake news, perhaps in time for President Trump’s reelection bid in 2020.

This backlash against CNN, and its eventual terminal decline will be a striking example to the rest of the legacy media – take note New York Times, MSNBC, etc. – of what happens when you declare war on an internet savvy generation of shitposters, and a President who’s not afraid to use Twitter.



The Hubris Of Carl Bernstein And His Ilk

In truth much could be written about the following 48 second clip, but the most important and ominous part is during the first 17 seconds:

Carl Bernstein – known for his investigative reporting on the Watergate scandal leading to President Richard Nixon’s resignation – begins by claiming that the US is in the midst of a “malignant presidency.”

His choice of words is interesting, because the implication is that Donald Trump’s presidency is a malignant tumour that needs to be removed. He follows by claiming that this malignancy is known to the “military leaders of the country, Republican leadership in congress who recognise it, and intelligence community.”

There’s no doubt that the President has enemies in all three of these groups, but he has many friends and supporters also, if not he would not have survived – politically and physically – this long in the face of so much unwarranted hostility.

Without a doubt Bernstein has sources that have voiced their unjustified complaints to him, and may have even used the adjective “malignant” to describe their twisted view of the Presidents office, and if so this is a veiled threat which he has then decided to voice on CNN.

The fact that CNN employees have been caught admitting on camera by Project Veritas that their coverage of the Trump-Russia story is baseless is serious enough, but to then give airtime to a guest who utters these veiled threats against a President who has tenaciously defended himself against their fake news, is another ominous development.

If the left thinks that President Trump will be removed by a military coup, senile RINO’s like John McCain, or those in the intelligence community who have secretly sworn their allegiance to someone or something other than the American Constitution, then they’re gravely mistaken.

That’s not to say that President Trump is invincible – he’s clearly in danger, but it’s a danger he’s prepared and willing to face, and he does not stand alone. For self preservation, his enemies, and the enemies of the American Republic would do well to take heed of warnings like this one from Alex Jones:

“Be selfish for your own personal lives and back off.” The truth is that the “elites” mentioned in the above video are the real malignancy in America, and throughout the world, and the light of truth needs to be shined on them and their wicked ways.

Comey’s Testimony

There’s no need to go into more details on the Comey hearing here, which has made all the top headlines the past couple of days in the US and been discussed ad nauseam already.

Suffice to say that despite the left’s best efforts to salvage something from it in terms of incriminating Trump in any wrong doing, it was a bit of an anticlimax for those calling for impeachment, and quite an eye opener to see Comey admitting to leaking confidential information to a reporter via a friend.

Two videos worth watching on the subject are from Tucker Carlson and Stefan Molyneux. Enjoy:

MSNBC’s Obsession With Trump

It seems that MSNBC has an obsession with President Trump. That might seem like something obvious considering the constant barrage of negative news coverage he’s been subjected to throughout his first six months in office, but it really hits home visually when you visit their home page and are confronted by the following:


Is it me or is there something strange about this picture…?

As can be seen, all their top stories are a barrage of Comey testimony and Trump related stories which leaves one wondering if there’s anything else going on in the MSNBC studios in terms of reporting on other important US and world news? With pundits like Al Sharpton on their payroll the answer is likely a resounding no.

Of course it’s not just MSNBC but the leftwing media in general, and if Breitbart, Fox News, and others on the right are spending more time than normal covering the President, it’s because there has to be a counterargument against the constant attacks which amount to nothing more than propaganda worthy of countries like Venezuela.

It’s hard to imagine Obama receiving this much negative media from the right during his two terms of office, despite the fact that he was incredibly unpopular among Republicans, and would probably have been with a considerable amount of Democrat’s if it wasn’t for the colour of his skin.

But does this behaviour by the left reveal something about it’s psychology as a group? Are people on the left more prone to whining and constantly playing the victim, as it so often appears to even the most casual observer? Is it any wonder that so called “progressivism” and all the baggage that comes with it – from slut walks to gender fluidity, to whatever other destabilising perversions they thrust into our lives – is an ideology of the left and not the right? Reach your own conclusions.

What Do President Trump’s Poll Numbers Really Tell Us?

Success in politics is dependent on popularity to get elected, and the best way we have of gauging that – apart from Twitter followers, likes, and other forms of social media tools utilised in modern politics – is via opinion polls. However once a politician is in office the importance of the results of opinion polls tends to diminish somewhat, until the next election approaches and campaigning begins again.

During the election campaign against Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump repeatedly stated that the polls were rigged, and even warned about potential voter fraud. Rigging polls is not an occult science, and during the election where there was so much at stake for both sides, it’s clear that the establishment candidate was favoured in more ways than one.

That said, despite the ominous title, there is some truth worth highlighting in the following article from CNN:

On March 11, 45% of Americans approved of the job Donald Trump was doing in Gallup’s daily tracking poll. It’s been all downhill since then.

In the intervening 86 days, Trump’s job approval has never again reached 45% in Gallup’s data. In fact, the last time Trump was even at 43% was on April 28. He’s spent most of the time between then and now mired in the low 40s and high 30s.

And now, Trump finds himself in the midst of his worst extended poll run of his presidency. Starting on May 28 when Gallup put his job approval at 42%, Trump has been sliding downward. The latest Gallup track on June 3 put Trump’s job approval at a dismal 36% — a single percentage point away from the lowest ebb of his time in the White House. (On March 28, Trump’s job approval was at 35%.)

The Gallup numbers are no anomaly. A Quinnipiac University poll released in late May put Trump’s job approval at 37%. A Monmouth poll conducted in mid-May put Trump’s job approval at 39%.

Lets assume for the sake of argument that these poll numbers are correct, and frankly they’re not very encouraging for a man used to winning. That said, what do they really tell us? Specifically, are they low because Trump is an unpopular President due to the policies he’s implemented, or is he unpopular because on the one hand he’s been continually blocked from implementing some of his signature campaign promises such as the Muslim travel ban, and the US border wall with Mexico, and on the other continually attacked by the legacy media with the contrived story regarding collusion with Russia to manipulate the elections?

We’re continually reminded by Hillary Clinton that she won the popular vote, and there’s always going to be a considerable proportion of those voters who would rate President Trump negatively for simply getting out of bed each morning, but these poll numbers indicate that there’s a proportion of those that voted for him who would like to see him to get out of bed in the morning and start winning as he promised during the campaign.

Because of the incredibly hostile opposition Trump’s facing from the majority of Democrats and establishment Republicans, he hasn’t had the support needed to implement some of his signature campaign promises. He also appears to have alienated many of his supporters with the cruise missile attack on a Syrian Army base on 7 April, the reasons for which were dubious to say the least.

Whether or not this was an attempt to deflect attention away from the Trump-Russia collusion media onslaught we can only speculate, the fact is though that it conspicuously came back into the news following the cessation of hostilities against Assad in Syria – much to the chagrin of the never Trump neocons – and the dismissal of former FBI Director James Corey.

However there have been signs that the Russia story is wearing a little thin with many except the most diehard Trump impeachment apologists such as Maxine Waters, but with Comey’s upcoming testimony this week before the Senate Intelligence Committee, anything is possible, and the whole story is likely to be blown out of all proportions again, no matter how mundane his testimony is.

In reality Trump needs to follow through with the promises he made during his campaign, and ensure that his Republican base is placated, or at the very minimum angry enough with those blocking his agenda to ensure that the party isn’t negatively effected in the 2018 midterm elections:

Trump’s poll numbers — if they stay anywhere near as low as they currently are — could have a hugely negative impact on his party’s chances in the 2018 midterms elections. Since 1946, according to Gallup, when a president’s job approval rating is above 50%, the average number of seats his party loses in a midterm election is 14. When a president’s job approval rating is below 50%? Try an average 36-seat loss.

If history holds, Democrats would likely take back control of the House in 2018 — given that they only need a 24-seat gain to do so. (One factor working against Democrats: The House is pretty well sorted out on partisan lines. Only 23 House Republicans currently represent districts Hillary Clinton carried last November.)

A Democratic-controlled House would be a nightmare for Trump as he tried to begin preparing for his re-election bid in 2020. Not only would he struggle to move his main agenda items through a divided Congress but a Democratic majority would almost certainly aggressively pursue its oversight responsibilities on the Trump administration.

The best (only?) thing going for Trump — and Republicans — in terms of the polling is that it’s June 2017, not June 2018. There’s still time for Trump to move his numbers up. But, the last few months suggest that much of the public has made up its mind on how the president is handling his business — and Trump has been found wanting.

This is an accurate analysis of the situation and something Trump is certainly aware of. Never have we seen so much opposition to a President less than six months into his term of office. This tells us a lot about who Donald Trump is and what he stands for, and it should be a warning to some of his wavering supporters and the silent majority, that the man who wants to Make America Great Again, needs the backing of those who voted for that idea.

Trump Versus Merkel’s EU

After meetings of Nato and the G7 group of wealthy nations last week, German Chancellor Angela Merkel had the following to say according to the Guardian:

“The times in which we could completely depend on others are to a certain extent over,” she told an election rally in Munich on Sunday. “I’ve experienced that in the last few days. We Europeans truly have to take our fate into our own hands.”

The chancellor told a 2,500-strong crowd in the Bavarian capital that Germany and Europe would strive to remain on good terms with the US, Britain and other countries, “even with Russia”, but added: “We have to know that we must fight for our future on our own, for our destiny as Europeans.”

Notice how she says “we Europeans” instead of “we Germans.” It seems evident from Merkel’s past behaviour that she has an aversion to any manifestations of national pride, most probably the result of growing up in Communist East Germany, and the trauma caused by an official history of the country which begins with Hitlers ascent to power, and ends with the Holocaust.

Also, one is left wondering how many of the 2,500-strong crowd were recently settled “refugees,” who she has so enthusiastically welcomed into the country – not her own home of course – to the detriment of the countless victims of violent crimes, which have surged since the migrant crisis was engineered. Considering this it’s hard to believe that 2,500 Germans would still want to listen to her, much less give her their votes.

The leaders did vow to fight protectionism, reiterating “a commitment to keep our markets open”. They also agreed to step up pressure on North Korea, cooperate more closely on terrorism and look into placing tougher sanctions on Russia.

Keep markets open to China and their unfair trade practices? While they flood the EU and the US with their cheap – in both senses of the word – products while our manufacturing industries go out of business and blue-collar workers are left jobless, the effects of which are felt throughout the economy?

So she mentions Russia twice. The first time is to express her wish to remain on good terms with it, then the second mention is a kick in the proverbial balls by suggesting tougher sanctions on a country she would be wise not to provoke considering how badly their last war together ended for Germany.

But while six of the seven present renewed their commitment to the 2015 Paris accord on climate change, Trump said he needed more time to decide.

Merkel said the result of the “six against one” talks was “very difficult, if not to say very unsatisfactory”.

He needs more time to decide if the CO2 we exhale is a toxic armageddon gas?

Yes, the talks were extremely unsatisfactory for a woman used to getting her way, especially when the odds are six against one. Perhaps Trump should send her an autographed copy of The Art of the Deal.

At the Nato summit in Brussels on Thursday, Trump repeated past accusations that other members of the alliance were failing to meet its military spending commitment of 2% of GDP, saying this was “not fair” on US taxpayers.

He also failed to endorse the pact’s article five mutual defence clause – an omission seen as especially striking as he was unveiling a memorial to those killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the US, the only time it has been triggered.

President Trump gave them a stern telling off, and in typical schoolboy fashion a few of them giggled as his back was turned. If NATO member nations insist on maintaining an organisation whose usefulness ended with the Cold War, then the bare minimum they can do is pay what they agreed on.

Article five may have only been triggered once, but from the sounds of it Merkel and her lackeys were repeatedly triggered by Trump.

Speaking of lackeys:

By contrast, Merkel said she wished the new French president, Emmanuel Macron, every success and promised Germany would do what it could to help France in a bid to revive the ailing Franco-German engine that has long powered Europe.

Macron will certainly have the same success Merkel has had destroying the nation she presides if he has his way. His power handshake with Trump was meant to project the image of a strong leader onto this upstart beta male, establishment stooge, and former Rothschild banker, but he certainly didn’t fool Donald Trump with his act.

Maxine Waters: Cut Off Her Mic!

Maxine Waters is at it again. Not content with endlessly ranting on about the Trump-Russia election collusion conspiracy theory – and that’s being generous about it – and even bizarrely claiming in February that Putin invaded Korea, this time the African American Caucus is seeking a formal apology after she was cut off during a state convention speech, as reported by the Los Angeles Times:

Waters, a Los Angeles Democrat known for her comments on President Trump, had been speaking at a caucus meeting during the event Saturday night when the sound to her microphone was cut off.

Her microphone was cut off? Understandable, so far so good.

In a statement released late Wednesday, the caucus said it had concluded an investigation with the Sacramento City Council and executive staff from the California Democratic Party to determine what transpired. They found the state party retained the event planning firm Frontrunner to produce the convention, attended by nearly 3,000 people from across the state. Frontrunner subcontracted the audio and visual work to a separate firm that has not been identified.

The caucus said it was an employee of that firm that approached Waters and interrupted her remarks by pulling the plug connecting her microphone to the audio system.

The requests include the formal apology, “a commitment to sensitivity training for contracted and subcontracted employees and better training on protocols when meetings run longer than the contracted time.” It also is asking for reimbursement of the meeting expenses associated with the event, and for party leadership to work with the caucus and develop better security protocols.

So the real story here is that the audio guy had been sitting around for what seemed to him – and probably more than a few sitting in the audience – an interminably long period of time listening to this delusional woman stuttering through whatever speech she’d prepared on her favourite topic, punctuated here and there by extemporary ranting on more of the same, and finally decided he’d had enough after politely reminding members of the caucus several times beforehand about the meeting running longer than the contracted time.

Of course this employee knew that it was either pull the plug and be done with it or wait around for a few more unpaid hours while these sore losers disparage the man you voted for, because he did nothing more than promise to lower your taxes and build a wall to stop Mexicans from illegally entering the country and undercutting your company, leaving you without a job and no way to pay for your skyrocketing Obamacare premiums.

Not content with this, the caucus had the gall to request that the firms employees be subjected to sensitivity training – presumably this has to do with the fact that the employee in question is white, and the caucus had the knee-jerk reaction so typical of Democrats, that there was a racial motivation to his actions – and a reimbursement of the meeting expenses! Undoubtably if it had been President Trump refusing to pay a firm with a black employee, that would have been another motive for impeachment, and sensitivity training for the remainder of his term.

On the contrary, this employee and his firm should immediately be contacted by the White House, congratulated, and paid in advance for the audio and visual work required for President Trumps second inauguration in 2020. That would surely send the kind of message Maxine Waters and the Democratic Party deserve for the lies they continue to spread with the assistance of their puppets in the legacy media.